The court of Appeal noted as follows; “Pili, as we have seen, made a nil return of income for the year 2004. It alleged it was not trading for that year and that therefore, could not have earned any income upon which tax could have been levied. But we now know, and the Commissioner came...... Continue reading→
Expenditure having an intrinsic duality of purpose- Mallalieu v Drummond [1983]
The barrister, in accordance with Bar requirements, acquired and wore particular items of clothing, both in court and to and from the court to her chambers. The clothing was such as might be used for ordinary civilian purposes but she did not wear such clothing away from work. The barrister preferring to wear coloured clothes...... Continue reading→